hungmai210 reviews
hungmai210
Member since: 20-07-2021Country: NetherlandsCity: | Send PM |
reviews
-
25-09-2022
Meeting date Duration City Looks Services Communication 2022-09-18 10 Amsterdam : 1.0: 1.0: 1.0Kiss
Blowjob
CIM
Sex
Anal
Breast
Extra Ball
Photo
No
Don't know
No
Passive
Not available
Don't know
Don't know
Not that girl
I contacted the agency on September 17 for a 2-hour booking starting at 19:00 on September 18. I showed the agency a photo of the real girl I wanted and they made a booking stating a base fee of €350 for 2 hours, although the site says €340 for 2 hours.
https://www.charmingescortsamsterdam.com/escort-girls/Evelyn/
I asked upfront if there were any hidden charges or fees and was told “No , you have blowjob and sex (with condom) + taxi included,” although extra services cost more.
When Evelyn arrived 10 minutes late, she did not look like the girl in her photos (or dress as requested).. I took Evelyn upstairs to confirm the lack of resemblance to her photos before accusing her of anything. Evelyn was Middle Eastern with dark skin and not the White girl in the photos, did not have brown hair, was heavier than shown, and looked older than the 26 years advertised.
After entering my apartment, she demanded €350 upfront, which I paid, and then took an additional €150 for extra services. When I pointed out she was NOT the girl advertised on the site and showed her the site photos, she laughed and claimed the photos on the site were photoshopped, but there is nothing on the site (or in the chat transcript) warning customers that the photos shown were fake and not actual girls.
Evelyn said she would give me €100 back and keep the other €400 to pay for taxi and her time. I reminded her she had not done anything for the €500 paid, and demanded my €500 back in full. She ran out the door at 19:21 without returning any money, thereby confirming her intent to defraud.
I contacted the agency and informed them that the girl I had booked for 2 hours was not the one in her photos, took €500 for services not performed, and left after 10 minutes. I demanded a full refund and was refused, being told “If you call at escorts and you don’t want the girl you have to pay taxi.” There is no text on the website that makes this claim, nor is a taxi price ever mentioned in the chat transcript (other than being included in the €350 base fee), so it is an invention after the fact.
The agency then stated that the escort photos they posted were not real: “If you read carefully the text you will see that it s say the girls looks like pictures and not all are real , so stop pretending that you know the low [sic].” There is no such text on the Charming Escort website, nor is it in the chat transcript, so it is an invented excuse after the fact to justify illegal bait-and-switch activity.
The agency asked how much money Evelyn returned. When I said she returned nothing, the agency instructed her to return and refund me €350 and would withhold €150 for taxi over my objection. When I went downstairs, Evelyn quickly gave money folded in her hand and then walked away without allowing me time to inspect it. I counted it quickly and saw only €190 and called after her to stop. She then threw money on a counter, pointed to it, and ran out the door like a guilty thief, When I picked it up, there was only one €50 note on the counter, so I had received only €240 and not the €350 promised. The complex has security cameras, so I have requested footage of the girl and the transaction to prove she is dishonest.
I contacted the agency again at 19:46, but the agency claimed without proof that Evelyn had repaid €350. I gave them 10 minutes to come back with the rest of the money, but they ignored my request.
In sum, the advertised girl was not the one who showed up (so illegal bait-and-switch tactics, Dutch Civil Code Article 6:193g); I paid €500 for 2 hours of services that were not performed (so breach of contract); and now the agency is asking me to subsidize their fraud by stealing money after the fact.
KVK has no record of them under their name or license number, so the agency is likely operating illegally. Avoid the agency and their girls like the plague if you do not want to be ripped off.
-
Catherine reviews 01-09-2021
Meeting date Duration City Looks Services Communication 2021-08-30 2 hours Utrecht : 9.0: 10.0: 10.0Kiss
Blowjob
CIM
Sex
Anal
Breast
Extra Ball
Photo
With tongue
With condom
No
Active
No
Natural breasts
Don't know
Real picture
Go to profile -
14-08-2021
Meeting date Duration City Looks Services Communication 2021-08-14 2 hours Utrecht : 0.5: 0.5: 0.5Kiss
Blowjob
CIM
Sex
Anal
Breast
Extra Ball
Photo
No
Don't know
No
Passive
No
Natural breasts
Don't know
100% fixed in photoshop